Stop desecrating our Parliament
By Patrick Matbob
It does not matter whether the decision to remove the traditional objects was taken unilaterally by the Speaker or that he was implementing a committee’s decision. The committee’s decision is wrong. Priest, author and teacher, the late Fr Frank Mihalic had this definition for the word committee – it is a group of the unqualified, put together by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary.
It does not matter whether the decision to remove the traditional objects was taken unilaterally by the Speaker or that he was implementing a committee’s decision. The committee’s decision is wrong. Priest, author and teacher, the late Fr Frank Mihalic had this definition for the word committee – it is a group of the unqualified, put together by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary.
We, Papua New Guineans, have to constantly
remind ourselves that our country is not a naturally forged nation. PNG is not
made up of a single race of people, nor culture, language, religion or any
common experiences. We do not even have a shared experience such as a war that
would have brought us together. PNG is the nation of numerous tribal groups,
languages, cultures brought together by colonial powers for their own interests.
We are in reality an artificial nation and our biggest challenge today is to
stay together as a country. This is the reality for the founders of our country
when they created PNG. They wanted PNG to be a nation that would be united
within its diversity. In order to ensure
the diversity existed, symbols and representations of our differences were
deliberately sought and encouraged to be used to emphasise the rich diversity
that was being united. The Parliament is a great icon of this reality as it
encompasses PNG’s diversity as much as possible in the cultural symbols in an
effort to unite us.
We are told
that the cultural objects in Parliament are being removed because they are evil
and unchristian and somehow responsible for the poor behaviour of our leaders.
Religious arguments are complex because they depend on religious teachings and
interpretations that vary. Yet the act of removing cultural objects based on
Christian beliefs is a vain exercise. It is like trying to create heaven on
earth, in this case, a heaven in Parliament devoid of all earthly beliefs and
influences so that the Parliament is clean and pure. It is impossible. What
about the hearts of our leaders which is really where the roots of all good and
evil lie. It is us humans who decide in our hearts to commit the good or the
evil – and we do so using our bodies and the laws and many other cultural
objects that we have created – money, valuables, alcohol, drugs, weapons, art,
music, etc. Did not Jesus rebuke the leaders in his time calling them
hypocrites because their hearts were impure? “… You are like white-washed tombs
beautiful in appearance, but inside there are only dead bones and uncleanness
(Matt: 23: 27).” The cultural symbols in Parliament are evidence that our
ancestors’ were spiritual people and were in a quest to discover God long
before the arrival of Christian missionaries.
When the first missionaries arrived, they realised that the people had
strong traditional spiritual beliefs. Early missionaries banned many evil
practices such as cannibalism, sorcery and witchcraft and introduced
Christianity. They also realised there were many valuable cultural practices
essential to maintaining the well-being of a society and allowed people to
continue practicing their cultures. For instance a quote from the early Divine
Word Missionaries in Momase region – the missionaries were trained never to
tear down a culture but to study and appreciate it, use its good points and
whenever possible to baptise the rest of it. Thanks to early missionaries like them
we still have bride price payments, initiation rites that train villagers how
to live together, and the knowledge of art and crafts essential to daily living
such as making canoes, houses, gardens, songs and dances, etc.
We need our
cultural symbols for they are of value to us to stay together as a nation. There
have been actions by missionaries in the past to exterminate the cultures of people
they encountered in the belief that they were making them fully Christians. Instead
they only succeeded in dressing them up in white clothes to look like Europeans!
The result has been a complete disaster and certain societies such as the Australian
aborigines and former slave colonies are still trying to establish their
identities today.
So far people supporting the removal of
cultural artefacts have not said how these objects are influencing the leaders
and responsible for the problems happening in Parliament. They are putting
forward arguments without any evidence and accusing and condemning others of
idol worship and quoting scriptures that are taken out of context. Where is the
evidence that idol worship is happening in Parliament? Are there cult groups or
activities within Parliament where the objects are worshiped? How is this happening?
We are aware of and have evidence of cult activities in our schools in PNG but
there is no evidence whatsoever from the Parliament house.
Most of the
objects within the Parliament were carved in Port Moresby at the National Arts
School by artists brought from different parts of PNG. I am not aware of any
cultural ceremonies held to dedicate these objects to spirits they were
supposed to represent. The only ceremony we are aware of was the official
opening of the Parliament in August 7, 1984 by Prince Charles representing the
Queen as head of the Commonwealth.
The act of
blaming cultural objects for our problems in Parliament unfortunately reflects the
reluctance of our people to admit and accept that our leaders are human and
weak and can do wicked things as well as the good they are expected to do. Are
we not looking for scape goats for the sins of our leaders? We must also
realise and accept that our Parliament system is new, and is going through
changes which can have some upheavals like the recent political impasse. That
does not necessarily mean our leaders are under some evil influence. It means
we are looking for ways to make our Parliamentary democracy system work in
harmony with the changes that are continuously happening in PNG today.
The cultural
objects at the Parliament represent our cultural heritage which embodies our
identity. Our identity is important as we develop in the modern world because
it helps us to know our place in society and how we have come to be where we
are. Without this knowledge we are open to being exploited and abused by
powerful organisations that we come into contact with today. Our identity is
also our history, which is important as we move forward that we do not repeat the
mistakes of our ancestors.
The action of
the Speaker and his committee also demonstrates a lack of respect and contempt for
our past leaders and elders in Parliament. This ‘holier than thou’ attitude of
casting stones at others is not healthy for us and is not the teachings of
Christ. One of the homes of dying used by Mother Therese of Calcutta was an old
Hindu Temple where Hindu gods were worshipped. This was of absolute no concern
to her as she knew God’s love transcends races, religions, cults, beliefs, etc.
Majority of those she cared for were not Christians any way. Jesus gave few key
commandments: to love God and neighbour, and made it clear that on judgement
day there were will be particular questions asked: When I was hungry, when I was thirsty, … when I was sick and in
prison … etc. So instead of defacing the Parliament, what are we doing for our people, women and children who hunger and thirst not only for food but
for love and justice, who die of curable diseases, or imprisoned for committing
crimes to survive?
It is for these reasons that we should be
careful with what has been happening at the Parliament. When we remove the
cultural objects, what are we really doing? Are we really cleaning up the
Parliament and the actions of our leaders? I think not. We are removing the objects and symbols that help
to bring us together as a nation. If we are not careful we could be dismantling
PNG.