Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Mismanagement leaves workers in despair

 Mismanagement leaves workers in despair

 
By Patrick Matbob
 
People suffer when funds are mismanaged
KOMIS Angolo has worked for 26 years at the tobacco plant now owned by British Tobacco Company (B.A.T) in Madang. Since the early 1980s he has been contributing some of his fortnight pay towards his retirement savings with the National Provident Fund of Papua New Guinea (NPF).  He has been looking forward to retiring home to Saidor District where he plans to build a cocoa fermentery and start a family cocoa business.  His 25-year-old eldest son is already at home cultivating the farm.

However, for the last few months he has been a worried man. His employer has told him that the National Provident Fund has been mismanaged resulting in the Fund incurring a massive debt of K154m. Funds have been frozen and members risked losing 10 per cent of their savings.

Komis is worried about his money.

“I am not happy at all,” Komis said, shaking his head as he sipped a can of Coke during his lunch break.

“It’s not their money . . .  It is my hard work to look after my family.”

With little formal education, Komis does not understand the operations of NPF, nor how it has incurred the debt.

All he knows is that he gets regular statements from the Fund telling him how much his savings has grown each year. His last statement in 1998 said he had saved K14,000.

“It’s not good. I have a large family,” he said. He has eight children.

The Prime Minister, Sir Mekere has ordered an inquiry into NPF early this year which is currently in progress. Headed by a former judge, Toss Barnett, the inquiry has revealed gross mismanagement and abuse by former fund managers and directors since 1997.

“Officers have failed to fulfil their statutory responsibility and moral duties. There has been an almost total breakdown in operational procedures,” said Sir Mekere in a letter to all NPF members. “Checks and balances that ensure accountability have been ignored.”

Sir Mekere said the new managers of the Fund have sought legal advice to bring to justice those responsible.

The debt problem happened when the previous NPF board and management borrowed to fund the organisation’s growth. Many of the assets bought with borrowed capital were in the resource sector which did not generate dividends to meet interest costs. In 1998 and early 1999 resource markets came under strong downward pressure, with rising interest rates and a falling kina. This resulted in NPF being forced to sell these assets to retire debt. The other major asset built solely on borrowed money was the NPF Tower (known as the Deloitte Tower) to the amount of K60 million with an interest bill of approximately K12m per annum.

Camilus Dambui, from East Sepik believes he will never see his money.

“We have no faith in NPF. We will not get our money,” he said.

Camilus also works for British American Tobacco in Madang and has contributed K14 each fortnight towards NPF for the last six years.
He said his last statement which he received in 1996 showed he had over K1000 in his savings. He has no other savings.

He wants to go back to his village and use his NPF money to build a home and educate his children.

“How can the government treat us like this?,” he asked. “We are grassroot people.”

Contributors in Madang were furious when they first learnt about the plight of NPF. Employees of major companies such as B.A.T, James Barnes, and R.D. Cannery held urgent meetings with their employers and demanded that they withdraw their money from NPF and set up separate savings schemes.

“We have been meeting with the company four or five times already,” said Camillus. “We want them to set up our own fund.”

However, their employers have told them to await the outcome of the inquiry.

A new management has taken over NPF and since last year began the arduous task of restoring proper management of the Fund and retiring the massive K154m debt. As of December last year, the debt has been reduced to K38m and the new managers are confident that by December 2000 the Fund will be debt free. They have reported that their program is ahead of schedule.

The new managers have also drafted legislative changes to strengthen accountability and transparency in the NPF Act. The legislative changes recommended removal of government appointees from the NPF Board, to decide the appointment of both the chairman and managing director, enshrining the newly formed Audit and Remuneration committee within the Act, reducing the retirement age for entitlement from 55 to 50 years of age, and removal of the forfeiture rule on employer contributions.

Seated in his comfortable air-conditioned office in Madang, Francis Kasi is confident he will get all his savings from NPF.

“I know my money is safe. If they touch it, I take them to court,” Mr Kasi said confidently.

Mr Kasi is the branch manager of Ela Motors in Madang and another long time contributor to NPF.

Employers of Ela Motors and other companies have contributed K5 each and hired a lawyer to ensure that they contributions will be safe.

Mr Kasi has contributed for more than 15 years which, under the NPF laws, entitles him to all his savings.

“I’ve been in the system longer and I know how it works . . . The system is still operating,” he said.

He has suggested that a solution to preventing such mismanagement is to let the Bank of Papua New Guinea manage the Fund.

“That’s the best solution,” he said.

The prime minister has also made similar suggestions in Parliament recently.

Sir Mekere has promised action over the NPF crisis.

He said the government will prepare legislation to regulate the superannuation sector in PNG.

“The funds performance and the failings that caused it are unacceptable to the Government.

“This legislation will ensure that fund trustees, management and boards in every part of the industry are subject to the most rigorous monitoring possible and that fund processes and decisions are fully accountable and transparent.”

Thousands of Papua New Guineans like Komis and Camillus have been told by the employers to wait patiently.

They wait but anxiously. They will know their money is safe only when they have it in their hands. In the meantime, their dreams for retirement will have to wait . . .

ends

No comments:

Post a Comment